Friday, April 22, 2005

The (Oily) Worms Escape the Can

I thought I'd head out back into Peak Oil land just to see what was going on. Apparently things have been busy. Especially those who want to make THIS this big focus rather than, oh, the fact that the U.S. is busy levelling a country based on lies, or that the Constitution as it was known for over two centuries is now gone. No, the Peak Oil debate is even more important than the murder and cover-up that was 9-11 and the Pentagon Strike.

Found this, for example, from a blog called Catalytic Converter (great name!):

It is bound to happen eventually.Search for the truth long enough, post a little about it, and you will be contacted. Apparently no blog is small enough to avoid attention.I started a blog,
9.11 Soundbytes, to post quotes from the memory hole on the terrorist attack as I found them.

I received an interesting email from Mark Robinowitz of regarding the blog, and I will share a small fraction of it with you.My guess is that he regularly sends something similar to all sites that link to
The Pentagon Strike Video. The email makes him appear more like a paid COINTELPRO agent, or so I think.

Stumbled upon your site -
the "Pentagon Strike" video has been debunked by many of the bestwriters on 9/11 complicity issues - such as the author of the911research site you list. [...]

If you haven't seen the Pentagon Strike video mentioned above, you really must. I found it when the Washington Post did an article about it last year. CC goes on:

Now for a bit of context. The Pentagon has all but announced that they are using propaganda

U.S. government planting propaganda and misleading stories in the international media

BBC News
By Tom Carver
Wednesday, 20 February, 2002
Washington correspondent

The Pentagon is toying with the idea of black propaganda.As part of George Bush's war on terrorism, the military is thinking ofplanting propaganda and misleading stories in the international media.A new department has been set up inside the Pentagon with the Orwelliantitle of the Office of Strategic Influence.

It is well funded, is being run by a general and its aim is to influencepublic opinion abroad.Black and whiteIt has been canvassing opinion within the Pentagon on what it should do. [...]

I have written briefly here about psyop operations, and have posted an image of a
propaganda wheel from a 1950's government sponsored research paper demonstrating methods used. There is plenty of evidence that such activities have never stopped, and US citizens are a primary target of propaganda or psyops as it is now called.

There's more. What'es even more interesting (and the great fun of the internet) is another blog he found when searching for more about the (Mike) Ruppert- (Mark) Robinowitz connections, since Mike is a strong Peak Oil promoter too.

From Perfect Infidel:

[...] The dinner itself was "normal" in every respect, and MOST of the conversation was also "normal." It only got strange when politics - including the subject of George Bush and 9-11 - was brought up.

Our friends who circulate socially among various government officials brought out some photos to show of a recent private party. Among the attendees of said party - which I reiterate, was private and not an "official function," was the brother of Vladimir Putin! There was the usual grouping of various ministers, AND one of the most powerful men in the Financial World (and here I don't mean America, I mean the GLOBAL Financial world!)

What was interesting about these photos was the obvious camaraderie of these individuals depicted in the photographs. There was Vlad's brother whooping it up with what were obviously close pals in France.


So, of course I asked about this. What came next was, in a sense, quite shocking. It seems that it is common knowledge in these circles that Russian satellites photographed a ship-launched craft (seems to have been a drone type plane rather than a missle) that ended up impacting the Pentagon on Sept 11, 2001, and that, for various reasons this information has been withheld from the public.

I was naturally startled to hear this even though I have long held the opinion that it was NOT a commercial jetliner that hit the Pentagon. I think the thing that startled me was the fact that, if Russia (and perhaps other countries with satellites?) had proof that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon, why weren't they revealing this?

It was explained to me that during part of the time George Bush was "incommunicado" on September 11, 2001, he was on the phone to Putin "negotiating." That was a polite way of saying "blackmailing." Apparently, Bush, by way of MOSSAD and/or the CIA had enough goods on Vlad to keep him silent.

Now THAT explains why Putin has not responded publicly to the rather obnoxious criticisms of Russia made by Bush and Condi Rice.

In any event, it was explained to me further that these satellite photos HAD been revealed to Thierry Meyssan who was asked by either French or Russian intell to write his book "Pentagate" to "leak" the info that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon. His instructions were, apparently, that he had to "make the case" without recourse to official backing; he couldn't refer to the satellite photos.

Well, suddenly, a LOT of things began to make sense. [...]

A lot of pieces begin to fall into place if we begin to consider that the above has some validity (and I do). The above post from Perfect Infidel, goes on to discuss the author of the email sent to me, Mark Rabinowitz:

Another interesting event in this timeline was the creation of a website with the domain name This site lists what it calls "Bogus 9-11 Websites" saying:

The three biggest stories used to alienate the public from 9/11 truth

1. No Planes on 9/11 (Pentagon, North Tower WTC, "pod plane" at SouthTower, Pennsylvania)
2. The Jews Did It (Israel had foreknowledge and possibly played a role,but that doesn't justify anti-semitism and Holocaust Denial)
3. The Victims' Phone Calls Were Faked (a way to keep the 9/11 families and the skeptics from working together)

why are there bogus 9/11 websites? a mix of malice and incompetence, but both make real evidence harder to find
Perfect Infidel goes on:

Considering the very good case for the involvement of MOSSAD in 9-11, the very good case that the victims phone calls WERE faked, not to mention what I have discovered about satellite photos on 9-11, it sure does look like the Oil Empire Website is a "plant," so to say. So I did a whois lookup. Here's what I found: [...]
[catalytic: I cut out the whois information]

The site is claimed by a Mark Rabinowitz even if it was "prepared for use" as early as February of 2003. That, in itself, is rather suspicious. Seems that this was right about the time that the Meyssan book was making a splash.
Robinowitz was posting on usenet as far back as 1994 in regards to an auto free DC. He's on a few dc.biking threads on usenet.

Rabinowitz then did some reporting for the Institute of Global Communications based in MD.[See:]
He then moved to Eugene, Oregon by the looks of things and is into permaculture. He appears to be coming from a "green" perspective. He got into the Y2K hysteria for a bit and now it appears he's onto the "Peak Oil deal" via Ruppert.

Do a Ruppert- Robinowitz search on google and you'll see what I mean in regards to the Ruppert promotion.

So it DOES look like Ruppert - who has been quoted as promoting the "no plane theory" but has now advised everybody to just "forget 9-11 and concentrate on Peak Oil" - has a strange bedfellow with Rabinowitz.


You really need to read the whole post. PF also interviews another COINTELPRO researcher, Laura Knight-Jadczyk, who had a great deal to say about the Pentagon Strike too. This got my attention because she was one of the names in the Washington Post article about the video. She tells a creepy story about GWBII visiting her podunk little Florida town (New Port Richey) just after the Post article came out, causing a sharp resurgance in interest in the Pentagon attack. NPR had absolutely no importance to the the Florida campaign, so why take precious time out of a PRESIDENTIAL campaign to go there? She thinks that a point was being made.

What would you think?

No comments: